They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
Your essay (of around 1500 words) will be a critical analysis and evaluation of the argument of the “target article” you have chosen (that is, the “target article” you answered questions on in the first test). You will be expected to use the detailed appropriate methods of argument analysis and evaluation that we have practiced and developed. To prepare for writing your essay you should participate in the Discussion Forums on your “target article”, STRUCTURING YOUR EVALUATIVE ESSAY Essential reading: Sections above on Writing an Evaluative Essay Recommended: Govier, 5th edition, Ch. 12, Reflective Analysis of Longer Works Before you begin writing your essay Review the sub-sections above on Understanding, Developing an Appraisal, and Planning your Evaluative Essay; and study the corresponding pages in Govier. Remember that your finished essay has to be a self-contained analysis and evaluation of the target article. Write as if for readers who have NOT read the article and who have NOT studied critical thinking. YOU must tell your readers everything they need to know. For purposes of referencing, you may number the paragraphs in the target essay. If you do this, include a copy of the numbered article with your essay. Your essay needs the following parts: Introduction, Analysis, Evaluation, Conclusion. Follow the instructions below even when they depart from Goviers suggestions. Introduction In your introduction, identify the author and title of the article, and the publication in which it appeared. Then specify the core issue with which it deals. Be specific, avoid vagueness. Indicate whether your overall evaluation is positive, negative, or mixed, and briefly say why. Analysis (approximately 500 words) Begin by outlining the core thesis and core supporting argument the main argument. Next, expand this analysis to incorporate the important subarguments. Make sure your outline is sufficiently specific and detailed to clearly convey the logical flow how the arguments were meant to work to someone who has not read the article. A comprehensive analysis is very important, accounting for up to 30% of the mark for this assignment. So dont skimp on this stepallow 500 words or more for it. If you wish, you can include an Appendix which gives a more detailed analysis and perhaps also a diagram. Evaluation (up to 700 words): Use the ARG method Your evaluation is based on a specification of the critical thinking strengths and weaknesses of the target article. Clearly, strengths are factors that enhance the rating the target article receives on an ARG evaluation (strong evidence, relevant and acceptable premises, etc.). Weaknesses are factors that detract from the critical thinking merits of the article (inadequate evidence, irrelevant or unacceptable premises, fallacies, flawed analogies, etc.). While they can add value, literary merits (e.g. interest, style, etc.) are not the crucial factors. Provide ARG evaluations of important subarguments, not just the main argument. To perform a strong overall evaluation, it is not enough simply to list relevant critical thinking strengths and weaknesses. Instead, you need to ensure that you have identified the most significant strengths and weaknesses in terms of their impact on the main argument. Factors that affect key premises will have more impact than those that do not. Accordingly, you should explain the most significant strengths and weaknesses in their order of importance, beginning with those that have the greatest overall impact. You need to relate these to the segments of the target argument on which they have a direct impact, and explain how they strengthen or weaken it. Conclusion Reiterate your overall evaluation as positive, negative, or mixed, and briefly outline how this assessment follows from the balance of strengths and weakness you have identified.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more