ASSIGNMENT DUE BY MONDAY JUL 17 AT 0600 CENTRAL TIME.
Week 2 Assignment 1.1 – Submit Here
Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I
Prewriting Due Week 2 and worth 30 points
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. In Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. 1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue. 2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section
your position. 3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that
Description: PHI210 Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
Unacceptable Below 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations 60-69% DFair 70-79% CProficient 80-89% BExemplary 90-100% APHI210-A1-11. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue. Weight: 20%
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3.6 (11.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the issue.
Feedback:
Points Range: 3.6 (12%) – 4.2 (13.99%)
Insufficiently selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; insufficiently stated your position on the issue.
Points Range: 4.2 (14%) – 4.8 (15.99%)
Partially selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; partially stated your position on the issue.
Points Range: 4.8 (16%) – 5.4 (17.99%)
Satisfactorily selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; satisfactorily stated your position on the issue.
Points Range: 5.4 (18%) – 6 (20%)
Thoroughly selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; thoroughly stated your position on the issue.
PHI210-A1-22. Identify three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section from procon.org. Weight: 30%
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5.4 (17.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section from procon.org.
Points Range: 5.4 (18%) – 6.3 (20.99%)
Insufficiently identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section from procon.org.
Points Range: 6.3 (21%) – 7.2 (23.99%)
Partially identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section from procon.org.
Points Range: 7.2 (24%) – 8.1 (26.99%)
Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section under “Con†from procon.org.
Points Range: 8.1 (27%) – 9 (30%)
Thoroughly identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro†or “Con†section “from procon.org.
PHI210-A1-33. Provide answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.Weight: 40%
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7.2 (23.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely provided answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
Points Range: 7.2 (24%) – 8.4 (27.99%)
Insufficiently provided answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
Points Range: 8.4 (28%) – 9.6 (31.99%)
Partially provided answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
Points Range: 9.6 (32%) – 10.8 (35.99%)
Satisfactorily provided answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
Points Range: 10.8 (36%) – 12 (40%)
Thoroughly provided answers to the “believing questions†for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
PHI210-A1-44. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Follow APA Style format. Weight: 10%
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 1.8 (5.99%)
Points Range: 1.8 (6%) – 2.1 (6.99%)
Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.
Points Range: 2.1 (7%) – 2.4 (7.99%)
Points Range: 2.4 (8%) – 2.7 (8.99%)
Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.
Points Range: 2.7 (9%) – 3 (10%)
Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.
They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more