They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
technical paper:
Due Week 10 and worth 140 pointsUse the Internet or Strayer databases to research the advantages, features, and common examples of OOP and EDP. Note: You may use the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library to support research on the above topics. Instructions detailing the necessary steps to access the ACM Digital Library are located at the end of the Course Guide.Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
grading rubric:Points: 140Technical Paper: Object-oriented Programming (OOP) / Event-Driven Programming (EDP) versus Procedural Programming (PP)CriteriaUnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% DFair70-79% CProficient80-89% BExemplary90-100% A1. Identify at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletelyidentified at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.Insufficiently identified at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.Partially identified at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.Satisfactorily identified at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.Thoroughly identified at least two (2) advantages to using OOP as compared to using only PP.2. Create one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Identify what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Next, examine the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified. Weight: 25%Did not submit or incompletelycreated one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Did not submit or incompletely identified what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Did not submit or incompletely examined the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified.Insufficiently created one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Insufficiently identified what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Insufficiently examined the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified.Partially created one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Partially identified what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Partially examined the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified.Satisfactorily created one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Satisfactorily identified what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Satisfactorily examined the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified.Thoroughly created one (1) original example of a class with at least one (1) attribute and one (1) method. Thoroughly identified what the class in question represents, the attributes the class stores, and the purpose of the related method. Thoroughly examined the relationship between the class, attributes, and methods that you have identified.3. Describe at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletelydescribed at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.Insufficiently described at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.Partially described at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.Satisfactorily described at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.Thoroughly described at least one (1) feature of object-oriented programming that Visual Logic lacks.4. Identify at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely identified at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.Insufficiently identified at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.Partially identified at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.Satisfactorily identified at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.Thoroughly identified at least one (1) advantage to using event-driven programming, as compared to using purely procedural programming.5. 3 referencesWeight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors present
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more