They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various tax court cases involving individual and corporate transactions that have been decided at all levels of the United States court system. These cases have often established the precedent for the treatment of certain tax transactions, and serve as a source of tax research. Assigned court cases will reinforce the key concepts learned in class. Students will summarize their choice of the following court cases (or their own selection with pre-approval by the instructor), using the “FICA” model of analysis. FICA stands for Fact, Issue, Conclusion, and Analysis and allows you to concisely summarize the conclusions of a court case. To summarize the case, follow these steps:
Briefs should be at least two pages long, double-spaced, 12-point font.
Sample Court Cases:
Cavaretta v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2010-4.
Comm’r v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co., 493 US 203.
Comm’r v. Lincoln Electric Co., 176 F.2d 815
Comm’r v. Sullivan, 356 US 27.
Complete Auto Transit, Inc v. Brady, 430 US 274.
Geoffrey, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission, S.C. Sup. Ct., 313 S.C.
Gregory v. Helvering, 293 US 465.
Indopco v. Comm’r, 503 U.S. 79.
Kerns v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2004-63.
Lanco, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, NJ Sup. Ct., Dkt. No. A-89-05.
National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of the State of Illinois, 386 US 753.
Northwestern Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 US 450.
Quail Corporation v. North Dakota, 504 US 298.
Renkemeyer, Campbell, & Weaver LLP v. Comm’r, 136 T.C. 137.
Retief Goosen v. Comm’r, 136 T.C. No. 27.
Scripto, Inc. v. Carson, Sherriff, et al., 362 US 207.
Tax Comm’r of West Virginia v. MBNA America Bank, 640 SE 2d 226.
U.S. v. Boulware, 558 F.3d 971.
U.S. v. Davis, 397 US 301.
Welch v. Helvering, 290 US 111.
Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr. Co., 505 US 214.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more